Anthropic Gives Third-Party Evaluator METR Employee-Level Access to Its Models
Anthropic announced on October 15 that it is granting a team from nonprofit AI evaluator METR employee-level access to its systems, allowing METR to independently assess its advanced models, safety practices, and risk management — and to publish the results independently.

What happened
Reuters reported on October 15 that Anthropic said on Thursday it has granted a team from nonprofit AI evaluator METR employee-level access to its systems, allowing the group to independently assess its advanced models, safety practices, and risk management.
Six METR employees have been provided company hardware, office space, and access to internal tools and systems broadly comparable to those available to Anthropic's own risk assessment teams, the company said.
METR will be able to publish independent assessments of risks, incidents, and safety practices without Anthropic's prior approval, subject only to limited redactions covering customer data, privileged information, and certain model architecture details.
The announcement follows concerns among researchers and evaluators that leading AI labs could wield too much influence over independent reviews through publication restrictions and control over access to sensitive information, Reuters reported.
Key facts
- Access scope: Six METR employees receive company hardware, office space, and internal tools and systems broadly comparable to Anthropic's own risk assessment teams
- Evaluation scope: METR can independently assess Anthropic's advanced models, safety practices, and risk management
- Independent publication: METR may publish assessments of risks, incidents, and safety practices without prior approval; only limited redactions apply for customer data, privileged information, and certain model architecture details
- Context: The move responds to researchers' concerns that leading labs could shape independent reviews through publication restrictions and control of sensitive-information access
Why it matters
A leading AI lab is for the first time letting an outside evaluator assess independently at internal-team-level access and publish independently — third-party evaluation moves from invited testing toward standing independent review.
CompaniesAnthropic
Comments
Related
- Oct 4Former OpenAI Safety Staffer Explains Resignation: "The Time for Trial and Error Is Over"
- Oct 15US FTC Issues Civil Subpoenas to OpenAI and Anthropic: AI Safety Probe Escalates
- Oct 14UK Parliament AI Safety Hearing: OpenAI and Anthropic Call for Binding Rules as Google and Meta Decline
- Oct 13OpenAI and Anthropic Urge Binding AI Safety Rules at UK Parliament Hearing
- Oct 11White House Tells AI Companies Incident Reporting Is Mandatory, After Anthropic's Disclosure
Today
Oct 16 Friday- Brief
- Quiz
- Call
Latest news
All →- Oct 15iFixAi Hits GitHub Trending: "Is This AI Agent Doing Its Job?" Answered in 120 Seconds
- Oct 15US Treasury Pushes to Rename AI as "Super Intelligence" Globally
- Oct 15xAI Releases Grok Voice 3.0, Topping Speech-to-Speech Benchmarks at Unchanged Price
- Oct 15Google Opens Frontier Models to 200 European Scientists with $3M in Compute Credits
- Oct 15Australia's Apate Sends Thousands of AI Agents Undercover to Fight Scammers
- Oct 15Figma Launches Specs, a Design-Rule System for AI Agents
™