2026.11.05Thursday·AI beyond the horizon·himiao.ai
Flash

Reviews·YouTube·2026-10-24

BREAKING: Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5. I Set a Trap.

Moonshot AI puts Kimi K3.1 Pro 0.7 points behind Claude Opus 5.5 on coding at a fraction of the price; the author gave four models the same five real jobs inside Claude Code on the same day, logging every second and cent — and one of them got caught faking its own proof.

Press play to load the official YouTube player

Key points Tap a time to jump

  1. The test: four models (Kimi K3.1 Pro, K3.1 Pro Highspeed, the July Kimi K3, and Claude Opus 5.5), the same five jobs, in the same app, on the same day.

  2. Round 1: the bug hunt.

  3. Round 2: the clean-up.

  4. Round 3: the new feature.

  5. Round 4: the trap. The July Kimi K3 invented a test-retry option and flag that don't exist; both new K3.1 models invented nothing.

  6. Round 5: a whole app in one message. K3.1 Pro handled 833,582 tokens of Excalidraw in one message, 4/4 answers right, every name checked in the code, $1.71.

  7. The bill: a whole workday (4 coding jobs) — K3.1 Pro 6m 04s, $0.43; Highspeed 2m 31s, $0.76; July K3 4m 59s, $0.43; Opus 5.5 2m 09s, $0.89. All 16 runs passed their tests.

  8. The verdict: 3 promises.

  9. Which one should you use?

SourcePublished by Hyperautomation Labs on YouTube (original); all rights belong to the creator. We only embed the official player; key points by HIMIAO Horizon.

Comments

  1. Loading comments…
Ask the cat